Lithium batteries, primary, manufacturing · Georgia

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales

Columbus, GA · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Lithium batteries, primary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Lithium batteries, primary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales safety composite

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335912 · Columbus, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Energizer Holdings I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Energizer Holdings Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Lithium batteries, primary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=3.9 · 2020=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales falls in its industry

42 Lithium batteries, primary, ma establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Lithium batteries, primary, ma employers in Georgia.

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales (47 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 181 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales
Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales (47 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 181 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Admin Offices?Packaging Consumer Batteries/Sales has fewer employees than the Lithium batteries, primary, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 3.9 1.9 1 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335912 · GA · Columbus

42 Lithium batteries, primary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Energizer Holdings Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electrochem Solutions Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portage Plant 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rayovac Dixon 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SS-Harvest South 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens TMC 1004 Boulevard Athens GA 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Valdosta 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Austell Operating - 2525 Old Alabama Rd. Austell 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 1905 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Portland 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 880 Gainesville, Fl 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 746 Harwood Heights, Il 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux City Public Library 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Famous Dave's - Support Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Man Orlando, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritge Manor of Bossier 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.