Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Minnesota

Administrative Office

Rochester, MN · ~100 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Administrative Office runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade C.

Administrative Office: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Administrative Office safety composite

Administrative Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−231.8

2017→2019

Administrative Office injury rate improved

Administrative Office's TCR fell 231.8 from 231.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 231.8 TCR.

2017=231.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Rochester, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/58
  • PHOTO Department for Aging…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Administrative Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Administrative Office averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Administrative Office TCR series: 2017=231.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Administrative Office falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 58 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Minnesota.

Administrative Office (100 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Administrative Office
Administrative Office (100 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Administrative Office has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 231.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MN · Rochester

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRCI - Premier Drive 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin Rest Area Dodge 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WARNING LITES OF MN 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works Department 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Plumbing & Heating 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rock Hill MO 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farstad Oil Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Utilities of GA Ince 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duro Bag - Alsip 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.