Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · California

Administrative Offices

Petaluma, CA · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Administrative Offices runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Administrative Offices: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Administrative Offices safety composite

Administrative Offices scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Administrative Offices held a steady TCR band

Administrative Offices's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Petaluma, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/38
  • PHOTO Andover Office
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Administrative Offices in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Administrative Offices averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Administrative Offices TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Administrative Offices falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 38 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in California.

Administrative Offices (59 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Administrative Offices
Administrative Offices (59 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Administrative Offices has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · CA · Petaluma

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 153 employers in Petaluma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Office 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR M753-M001 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DSM Food Specialties 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 753-PL001 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 136 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 470 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 169 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solairus Aviation 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Salt Lake City 2 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Schomburg & Schomburg Construction Incorporated 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Construction 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR WA-Everett 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Site Work Specialists 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Craft Company 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cross High School 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambar, Inc. 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.