Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Anthem Chico Management

Chico, CA · ~59 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anthem Chico Management runs at 696% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Anthem Chico Management: 26.5 TCR = 696% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anthem Chico Management safety composite

Anthem Chico Management scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anthem Chico Management: 8.9 → 20.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 38.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2023

Anthem Chico Management's TCR rose 11.7 from 8.9 in 2016 to 20.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 38.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chico, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.5 · 696% of ind

  • DART 20.6 DART
  • RANK #627/635
  • PHOTO Bishops Court
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bishops Court (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Anthem Chico Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anthem Chico Management averages 26.5 TCR (696% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anthem Chico Management TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=36.5 · 2018=38.6 · 2019=27.7 · 2023=20.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Anthem Chico Management falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #627 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Anthem Chico Management (59 employees, TCR 26.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Anthem Chico Management
Anthem Chico Management (59 employees, TCR 26.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Anthem Chico Management has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.6 20.6 6 0 0
2019 27.7 12.8 13 0 0
2018 38.6 16.9 16 0 0
2017 36.5 22.8 16 0 0
2016 8.9 8.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Chico

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 189 employers in Chico, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bishops Court 26.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Myron Stratton Home 26.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oswego Memory Care LLC 26.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summerfield of Fresno 26.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-11 4,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enloe Medical Center Employees 3,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 72 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 521 2,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Kansas City Railcar Service 26.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0168 Portland 26.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bloomington Office-Shunk Corp 26.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chimp Haven 26.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Wind Construction IDF 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelley St 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Plains Labor, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kennewick, WA 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.