County supervisors' and executives' offices · North Carolina

Administrative Services

Asheville, NC · ~298 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Administrative Services runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical County supervisors' and executives' offices workplace, earning a grade B.

Administrative Services: 2.1 TCR = 65% of County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Administrative Services safety composite

Administrative Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2020

Administrative Services injury rate improved

Administrative Services's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/47
  • PHOTO City of Oak Park Hei…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Oak Park Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Administrative Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Administrative Services averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Administrative Services TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.9 · BLS 3.2

Where Administrative Services falls in its industry

1,010 County supervisors' and execut establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 47 County supervisors' and execut employers in North Carolina.

Administrative Services (298 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Administrative Services
Administrative Services (298 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Administrative Services has more employees than the County supervisors' and executives' offi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.9 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.6 1.3 5 1 0
2018 2.7 1.8 6 0 0
2017 2.4 1.9 4 1 0
2016 1.9 1.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · NC · Asheville

1,010 County supervisors' and executives' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Oak Park Heights 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Botetourt County Board of Supervisors 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Safety Bldg 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR COH City Hall 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Apex 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Chapel Hill 140 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZECA 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Specialty Hospital 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - GDL 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Dane Trailers Vans Division 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Recycling Shreveport,LA. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Hospital 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milbank Manufacturing Kansas City 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evonik Corp Parsippany Site 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA148 Lehigh Valley (Dixie) Easton 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.