Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing · Ohio

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies

Norwalk, OH · ~113 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies safety composite

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2018→2020

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies injury rate improved

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.9 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Norwalk, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/32
  • PHOTO Biomerics
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Biomerics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies TCR series: 2018=0.9 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies falls in its industry

741 Instruments, mechanical micros establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 32 Instruments, mechanical micros employers in Ohio.

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies (113 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies
GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies (113 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

GYRUS ACMI, INC. Olympus Surgical Technologies has fewer employees than the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 4.4 4 2 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · OH · Norwalk

741 Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 60 employers in Norwalk, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Biomerics 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence, Inc. Cranston 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Region Medical-LAC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arthrex Trauma Inc 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hillandale Farms Ohio LLC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premium Building Products 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triton Services 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirk Williams Company 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fisher Titus Medical Center 1,024 FTE
CITY-NEAR R+L Carriers - NOR 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1986 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Borgers 337 FTE
NAT-TCR Administrative Services 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - GDL 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Dane Trailers Vans Division 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Recycling Shreveport,LA. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eagle Roofing Products, Phoenix, AZ 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flannery Oaks Guest House 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE BAE Systems, Inc. SJC 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northlake Care Center 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.