Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction · North Carolina

Advanced Exterior Systems

Raleigh, NC · ~93 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Exterior Systems runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Advanced Exterior Systems: 3.6 TCR = 124% of Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Exterior Systems safety composite

Advanced Exterior Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Advanced Exterior Systems: 2.4 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

Advanced Exterior Systems's TCR rose 0.5 from 2.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 124% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #79/93
  • PHOTO J.T. Harrison Constr…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.T. Harrison Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Exterior Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Exterior Systems averages 3.6 TCR (124% of the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Exterior Systems TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=3 · BLS 2.9

Where Advanced Exterior Systems falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and inst establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 93 Warehouse, commercial and inst employers in North Carolina.

Advanced Exterior Systems (93 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Exterior Systems
Advanced Exterior Systems (93 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Advanced Exterior Systems has more employees than the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2019 8.1 6.7 6 0 0
2018 6.4 6.4 5 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NC · Raleigh

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.T. Harrison Construction Co., Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR R. G. Ross Construction Co., Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premium Concrete Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paradigm Construction 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Charlotte 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP-Mid Atlantic LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lightserve Corporation 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hales and Associates, Inc. Main Office 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Altoona Plant 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Willis-Knighton South and the Center for Women's Health 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR W L Fuller Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Design Systems, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leeda Northeast Portage 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pavilion at Glacier Valley 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Branch 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE FoodTown #209 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.