Polyurethane foam products manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Altoona Plant

Altoona, PA · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Altoona Plant runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Polyurethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Altoona Plant: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Altoona Plant safety composite

Altoona Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2016→2024

Altoona Plant injury rate improved

Altoona Plant's TCR fell 8.1 from 8.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Altoona, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/24
  • PHOTO New Castle, IN
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Castle, IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Altoona Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Altoona Plant averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Altoona Plant TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=4 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Altoona Plant falls in its industry

474 Polyurethane foam products man establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 24 Polyurethane foam products man employers in Pennsylvania.

Altoona Plant (65 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Altoona Plant
Altoona Plant (65 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Altoona Plant has fewer employees than the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2018 5.5 5.5 4 0 0
2017 9.3 8.2 8 1 0
2016 8.1 4.0 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · PA · Altoona

474 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 120 employers in Altoona, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Castle, IN 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferdinand Branch Plant 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Technologies GT 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Star Roses and Plants 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - Willow Grove 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yoe Construction, Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yoe Industrial Services 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pyramid Healthcare Inc 3,019 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Altoona 2,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Nursing Agency and Visiting Nurse Association 785 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Altoona Regional Health Services Inc 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Advanced Exterior Systems 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Willis-Knighton South and the Center for Women's Health 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR W L Fuller Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Design Systems, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millard Drywall & Acoustical Construction, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pat Williams Construction 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Social Ministries of New Jersey - Housing 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7312 Kingspointe Pkwy 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.