Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · California

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc.

Corona, CA · ~156 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc.: 4.4 TCR = 82% of Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 4.3 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2019=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Corona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #15/29
  • PHOTO Flex-N-Gate Texas, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flex-N-Gate Texas, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. averages 4.4 TCR (82% of the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2019=4.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 29 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil employers in California.

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. (156 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc.
Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. (156 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Advanced Flow Engineering, Inc. has more employees than the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) au median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.5 0.6 7 0 0
2017 4.3 2.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · CA · Corona

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flex-N-Gate Texas, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inalfa SSI Roof Systems, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakkota Brownstown 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dakkota Lansing 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Celery 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Foods, Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Strathmore 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing Plant 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Charles Jacquin et Cie, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - Pin-Effingham 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn Engineering, Winston-Salem Division 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-State Special Education 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southside Soapbox 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transmission Op Center New Albany 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 27 Enterprise Drive 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Manor 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.