Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) · Florida

Advanced Imaging

Ocala, FL · ~59 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Imaging runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) workplace, earning a grade A.

Advanced Imaging: 0.8 TCR = 22% of Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Imaging safety composite

Advanced Imaging scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Advanced Imaging held a steady TCR band

Advanced Imaging's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621512 · Ocala, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO California Advanced …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Advanced Imaging Medical Associates - San Francisco Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Imaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Imaging averages 0.8 TCR (22% of the Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Imaging TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=2 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Advanced Imaging falls in its industry

62 Diagnostic imaging centers (me establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Diagnostic imaging centers (me employers in Florida.

Advanced Imaging (59 employees, TCR 0.8) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Imaging
Advanced Imaging (59 employees, TCR 0.8) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Advanced Imaging has more employees than the Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621512 · FL · Ocala

62 Diagnostic imaging centers (medical) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 391 employers in Ocala, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Advanced Imaging Medical Associates - San Francisco Division 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SimonMed Imaging-Corporate 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Ventures, Inc. (221-25) 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adventist HealthCare Imaging 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2406-Felda, FL (Monsanto Co.) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Packing Company LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE PTF Plant Turkey Point 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winter Haven Service Area 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ocala 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Ocala Hospital 2,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Ocala 1,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocala Regional Medical Center 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern New Jersey Engineering 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Machine Specialty & Manufacturing, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandvik Inc. - Spanish Fork 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hassalo on Eighth 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Exelon Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE McDonald's 27808 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solar Art 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE PeopleCare LLC 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.