Industry profile · NAICS 621512

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers

Workplace injury rates across 76 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 62 establishments with a credible rate.

76
Employers
5.2
Avg TCR (rated)
3.8
BLS benchmark
422
Injuries (all)

TCR, interpreted

Above average

5.2 avg TCR

The industry picture

The 62 rated employers in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers average 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.8.

5.2
avg TCR · rated subset
3.8
BLS national benchmark
62
rated employers
422
recordable injuries (all)

ITA inventory (76) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. Corpus rank matches /rankings/most-dangerous-industries (≥100 rated employers). BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.

What Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers Safety Data Reveals

The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers sector (NAICS 621512) encompasses 76 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 422 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 62 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Oregon Imaging Center Eugene, AL F 20.5
SimonMed-Estrella Phoenix, AZ F 16.6
SHC Youngstown Ohio Laboratory Services Poland, OH F 12.4
Imaging Center of Idaho Caldwell, ID F 12.3
Pmdut, LLC Draper, UT F 12.0
Riverside Diagnostic and Breast Imaging Oyster Point Newport News, VA F 11.7
Seattle NPHS Seattle, WA F 11.5
Health Ventures Inc (30608) Oakland, CA F 10.9
Health Ventures Inc (30768) Oakland, CA F 9.6
PMDTC, LLC- Northern CA X-ray Visalia, CA F 8.1
AKSM Columbus, OH F 8.0
X-ray and Imaging Locations Reno, NV D 7.4
Pmdco, LLC Denver, CO D 7.1
Aperion Care Springfield Springfield, IL D 7.1
Riverside Diagnostic Center-Hampton Hampton, VA D 7.1
Salmon Creek Vancouver, WA D 6.9
Shadow Lane Las Vegas, NV D 6.6
Baptist Outpatient Center Miami, FL D 6.0
Bay Medical Management Walnut Creek, CA D 6.0
Saint Luke's Outpatient Imaging Associates Kansas City, MO D 5.6
Health Ventures Inc (30291) Berkeley, CA D 5.5
496 County Road 111 Manorville, NY D 5.4
Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imaging-OP Newport News, VA D 5.3
Health Ventures, Inc. (221-H3C) Berkeley, CA D 5.0
Radia South Sound Radiology Olympia, WA D 4.9
California Advanced Imaging Medical Associates Novato, CA D 4.7
Baptist Breast Center Montgomery, AL D 4.7
Swedish Radia Imaging Center - Edmends Edmonds, WA C 4.5
Shared Medical Services Cottage Grove, WI C 4.3
East Montgomery Imaging Montgomery, AL C 4.2
Riverside Diagnostic/Breast Imag-OP-127 Newport News, VA C 4.2
Rhode Island Medical Imaging- Barrington Barrington, RI C 4.2
United Medical Systems Westborough, MA C 4.0
Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, NV C 3.9
South Sound Radiology Olympia, WA C 3.9
CarolinaEast Diagnostic Center New Bern, NC C 3.9
Shared Imaging LLC Downers Grove, IL C 3.8
Evergreen Radia Imaging Center Kirkland, WA C 3.7
Radia Seattle Radiologist Imaging Center Seattle, WA C 3.7
Health Ventures, Inc. (221-OK-004) Oakland, CA C 3.5
Intermountain Medical Imaging LLC Meridian, ID C 3.5
Dri @ 315 Greensboro, NC C 3.2
Riverside Diagnostic Center Hampton Hampton, VA C 3.1
Concept Open Imaging Center Lake Worth, FL B 2.8
Oregon Advanced Imaging LLC Medford, OR B 2.8
Northwest Las Vegas, NV B 2.5
Dri @ Bcg Greensboro, NC B 2.5
496 County Rd 111 Manorville, NY B 2.3
Pmdtc, LLC Oc/Ie/La Irvine, CA B 2.2
Swedish Radia Imaging Center Edmonds Edmonds, WA B 2.1
Page 1 of 2 Next →

Nationwide industries with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers: nearest NAICS cohorts by rated-subset average TCR and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-industry neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers?

Across 62 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers averages 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.8.

How does Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers compare with other industries nationally?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers has fewer than 100 rated employers, below the case-volume floor for the national industry ranking.

How many employers report in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers?

76 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 62 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.

Data sourced from official public datasets, PlainSafetyScore's OSHA ITA / BLS-based industry database (2016-2024). Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore. See our methodology for details.

Working in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers?

This sector averages 5.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers Safety FAQ

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers?

Across 62 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers averages 5.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.8.

How does Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers compare with other industries nationally?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers has fewer than 100 rated employers, below the case-volume floor for the national industry ranking.

How many employers report in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) centers?

76 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 62 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.