Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors · California

Advanced Restoration

San Jose, CA · ~96 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Restoration runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Advanced Restoration: 6.8 TCR = 178% of Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Restoration safety composite

Advanced Restoration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.2

2017→2023

Advanced Restoration injury rate improved

Advanced Restoration's TCR fell 12.2 from 12.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.2 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=10.3 · 2021=4.7 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 178% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/78
  • PHOTO Ruvica Builders, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ruvica Builders, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Restoration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Restoration averages 6.8 TCR (178% of the Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Restoration TCR series: 2017=12.2 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=10.3 · 2021=4.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Advanced Restoration falls in its industry

698 Fire and flood restoration, mu establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 78 Fire and flood restoration, mu employers in California.

Advanced Restoration (96 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Restoration
Advanced Restoration (96 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Advanced Restoration has more employees than the Fire and flood restoration, multifamily median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 4 0 0
2019 10.3 10.3 6 0 0
2018 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2017 12.2 8.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · CA · San Jose

698 Fire and flood restoration, multifamily building, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ruvica Builders, LLC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Forever Baths Company (DBA- Pacific Bath Chicago) 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott Tracy Eterprises, Inc., dba Servpro of Apopka/Wekiva and dba Servpro of West Orange 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodstock Building Associates, LLC 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SUN AND SANDS ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA PRIME TIME INTERNATIONAL 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willoughby Farms, Inc 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redding trim Shed 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUN VALLEY RAISINS, INC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Kpmf USA 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Local Government 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Des Moines Orthopaedic Surgeons PC - WDM 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornelia Nixon Davis, Inc 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vero Beach Museum of Art 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bountiful Farms Nursery 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southland Truck Group, LLC - Gray 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE HVJ Associates, Inc. 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.