Wheels (i.e., rims), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · California

advanced structural Technologies Inc

Oxnard, CA · ~154 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

advanced structural Technologies Inc runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Wheels (i.e., rims), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

advanced structural Technologies Inc: 11.5 TCR = 213% of Wheels (i.e., rims), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

advanced structural Technologies Inc safety composite

advanced structural Technologies Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2020→2024

advanced structural Technologies Inc injury rate improved

advanced structural Technologies Inc's TCR fell 2.7 from 12.8 in 2020 to 10.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=12.8 · 2024=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Oxnard, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 213% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #26/29
  • PHOTO Faurecia FCM Taylor
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Faurecia FCM Taylor (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

advanced structural Technologies Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows advanced structural Technologies Inc averages 11.5 TCR (213% of the Wheels (i.e., rims), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

advanced structural Technologies Inc TCR series: 2020=12.8 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 5.4

Where advanced structural Technologies Inc falls in its industry

772 Wheels (i.e., rims), automotiv establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 29 Wheels (i.e., rims), automotiv employers in California.

advanced structural Technologies Inc (154 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate advanced structural Technologies Inc
advanced structural Technologies Inc (154 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

advanced structural Technologies Inc has more employees than the Wheels (i.e., rims), automotive, truck, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 10.1 18 0 0
2020 12.8 12.8 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · CA · Oxnard

772 Wheels (i.e., rims), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 303 employers in Oxnard, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Faurecia FCM Taylor 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flex-N-Gate Detroit 32-0487145 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDIANA PRECISION FORGE LLC 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inventive LLC dba In The Ditch Towing Products 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers | Euclid Packinghouse 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.M. AG ENTERPRISE, INC. 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE AUBURN SERVICE CENTER 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Nuys District HDQ 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OXR1 2,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Oxnard 1,753 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030383 1,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Regional Medical Center 1,352 FTE
NAT-TCR Luke 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Transport - 089 089SH 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Huber Heights 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR River Park Residences, LP 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE TRC Construction Inc. 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Trucking, Inc MO 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merhow Acquisition LLC 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Plant 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.