Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · Texas

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas

Irving, TX · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade B.

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas: 3.0 TCR = 67% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas safety composite

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas: 1.8 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2024

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas's TCR rose 2.4 from 1.8 in 2023 to 4.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Irving, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 67% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #74/118
  • PHOTO Lubbock Texas
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lubbock Texas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas averages 3.0 TCR (67% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas TCR series: 2023=1.8 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 118 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Texas.

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas (94 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas
Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas (94 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Advantage Tank Lines 20196 Dallas has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 3.6 7 0 0
2023 1.8 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · TX · Irving

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 548 employers in Irving, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lubbock Texas 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stevens Transportation Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advantage Tank Lines 20311 - Milwaukee 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transystems LLC - Twin Falls Project 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Dalhart 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corpus Christi Electric System Ops 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 31090 - NEUAG 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christensen Building Group, LLC 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR 50CP001 CORP LAS COLINAS 4,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXC101551 2,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Corporation 2727 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RBD5 1,964 FTE
NAT-TCR Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Denver 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shell and Liquid Egg Production 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hope Network New Passages 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR T&L Painting Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Bean Technologies Corporation - California 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkwood Health Care Facility 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05103 - Apex Waste Services, Inc 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTS Contracting Inc. 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.