Residential Care mental hlth substnce · Michigan

Hope Network New Passages

Pontiac, MI · ~372 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hope Network New Passages runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Residential Care mental hlth substnce workplace, earning a grade B.

Hope Network New Passages: 3.0 TCR = 79% of Residential Care mental hlth substnce BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hope Network New Passages safety composite

Hope Network New Passages scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2024

Hope Network New Passages injury rate improved

Hope Network New Passages's TCR fell 1.3 from 2.0 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=7.7 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Pontiac, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Girls' Group Home
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~372 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Girls' Group Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hope Network New Passages in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hope Network New Passages averages 3.0 TCR (79% of the Residential Care mental hlth substnce BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hope Network New Passages TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2 · 2021=7.7 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Hope Network New Passages falls in its industry

1,165 Residential Care mental hlth s establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Residential Care mental hlth s employers in Michigan.

Hope Network New Passages (372 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hope Network New Passages
Hope Network New Passages (372 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Hope Network New Passages has more employees than the Residential Care mental hlth substnce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 8 0 0
2021 7.7 5.5 14 25 2
2020 2.0 1.3 6 5 0
2019 2.8 1.0 10 4 0
2018 2.0 1.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MI · Pontiac

1,165 Residential Care mental hlth substnce employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Girls' Group Home 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chestnut Health Systems Madison 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SBH Haverhill LLC dba Serenity at Summit New England 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MO StCharles 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alpine Power Systems 372 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendrick Plastics 372 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inalfa Roof Systems Auburn Hills Assembly 372 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer 033 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powertrain Headquaters 2,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
NAT-TCR Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Denver 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ferguson's Morningside Orchard LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Kenworth - Menomonie 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 7 Vermont Drive 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet-Corporate 372 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Integrated Services Inc. 372 FTE
NAT-SIZE Our Lady of the Lake Regional 372 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cumberland Heights Foundation, Inc. 372 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.