Laboratory testing services, medical radiological or X-ray · Maryland

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging

Germantown, MD · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Laboratory testing services, medical radiological or X-ray workplace, earning a grade A.

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging: 1.7 TCR = 45% of Laboratory testing services, medical radiological or X-ray BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging safety composite

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging: 0.0 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2020

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging's TCR rose 6.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621512 · Germantown, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 45% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK P82
  • PHOTO PN1G ST LOUIS PARK C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PN1G ST LOUIS PARK CT MR IMAGING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging averages 1.7 TCR (45% of the Laboratory testing services, medical radiological or X-ray BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging falls in its industry

62 Laboratory testing services, m establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging (36 employees, TCR 1.7) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging
Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging (36 employees, TCR 1.7) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Imaging has fewer employees than the Laboratory testing services, medical rad median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.9 3.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621512 · MD · Germantown

62 Laboratory testing services, medical radiological or X-ray employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 55 employers in Germantown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PN1G ST LOUIS PARK CT MR IMAGING 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peak Neuromonitoring 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delaney Radiologists Group, PLLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BH Breast Center 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ForwardGro, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gibraltar Construction Co., Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BOB BREEDING GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hughes Network Systems, LLC. 1,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Germantown 813 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Germantown Hospital-HCH-MD 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2357 520 FTE
NAT-TCR CSH - Courtyard Crabtree 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Commscope Santa Teresa Distribution Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1509 Family Fare - West Branch, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Falls Packaged Gas Store 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Dodge Center 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Butler County Rural Electric Cooperative 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jan-Care of South East 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Site Specific RI 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.