623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Illinois

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston

Charleston, IL · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston runs at 431% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston: 16.4 TCR = 431% of 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston safety composite

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston: 11.9 → 20.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.32× in 2024

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston's TCR rose 9.0 from 11.9 in 2023 to 20.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Charleston, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 431% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #82/84
  • PHOTO 524-526 Whalley Avenue
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 524-526 Whalley Avenue (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston averages 16.4 TCR (431% of the 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston TCR series: 2023=11.9 · 2024=20.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston falls in its industry

2,261 623210 Residential Intellectua establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 84 623210 Residential Intellectua employers in Illinois.

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston (23 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston
Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston (23 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Advocacy and Reynolds Charleston has fewer employees than the 623210 Residential Intellectual and Deve median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.9 5.2 4 0 0
2023 11.9 5.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · IL · Charleston

2,261 623210 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 41 employers in Charleston, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 524-526 Whalley Avenue 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas Day Program 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RBA 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1006-UCPMC-BARNEVELD CTR 16.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Farms, LLC. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Office 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nokomis Area Fire Protection District 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Illinois University 2,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston CUSD #1 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 612 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Illinois Area of Special Education 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Fossil Creek Nursery, Inc 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux City Police Department 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sprindance Hot Tubs- DC 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandstone of Spring Valley 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Syracuse Feedyard 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miles Ahead Technology LLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE St George Ut Sales Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Okalt - Altus 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.