Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Aegis Greenwood

Seattle, WA · ~72 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
27.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis Greenwood runs at 719% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis Greenwood: 27.3 TCR = 719% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis Greenwood safety composite

Aegis Greenwood scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 27.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2023→2024

Aegis Greenwood injury rate improved

Aegis Greenwood's TCR fell 4.1 from 29.4 in 2023 to 25.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 29.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=29.4 · 2024=25.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 27.3 · 719% of ind

  • DART 20.5 DART
  • RANK #109/109
  • PHOTO Caleo Bay
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caleo Bay (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aegis Greenwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis Greenwood averages 27.3 TCR (719% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis Greenwood TCR series: 2023=29.4 · 2024=25.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis Greenwood falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Aegis Greenwood (72 employees, TCR 27.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis Greenwood
Aegis Greenwood (72 employees, TCR 27.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Aegis Greenwood has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 25.3 20.5 6 10 0
2023 29.4 23.5 8 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Seattle

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caleo Bay 27.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Spring Creek of Boise 27.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Davenport Bickford 27.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harmony Homes By the Bay 27.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Pasco, WA Farm 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alaska Warrior 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Othello 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington Trails Association 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Longs Peak Dairy LLC PIERCE 27.3 TCR
NAT-TCR YOUNGSVILLE 27.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 189 ABC Supply Co., Inc 27.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 183 ABC Supply Co., Inc 27.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mcgann Construction Inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baskin Livestock, Inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market of Choice #11 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mesa Verde Enterprises 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.