Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New Hampshire

Harmony Homes By the Bay

Durham, NH · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
27.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harmony Homes By the Bay runs at 720% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Harmony Homes By the Bay: 27.4 TCR = 720% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harmony Homes By the Bay safety composite

Harmony Homes By the Bay scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 27.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−41.4

2017→2022

Harmony Homes By the Bay injury rate improved

Harmony Homes By the Bay's TCR fell 41.4 from 44.8 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 44.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=44.8 · 2018=31.4 · 2020=33.0 · 2021=24.1 · 2022=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Durham, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 27.4 · 720% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO Davenport Bickford
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Davenport Bickford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Harmony Homes By the Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harmony Homes By the Bay averages 27.4 TCR (720% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harmony Homes By the Bay TCR series: 2017=44.8 · 2018=31.4 · 2020=33 · 2021=24.1 · 2022=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Harmony Homes By the Bay falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Hampshire.

Harmony Homes By the Bay (47 employees, TCR 27.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Harmony Homes By the Bay
Harmony Homes By the Bay (47 employees, TCR 27.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Harmony Homes By the Bay has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 24.1 5.3 8 1 0
2020 33.0 33.0 4 9 0
2018 31.4 20.9 9 0 0
2017 44.8 22.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NH · Durham

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 10 employers in Durham, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Davenport Bickford 27.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Spring Creek of Boise 27.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caleo Bay 27.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis Greenwood 27.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Powers Generator Service, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE NorthEast Earth Mechanics, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scandia Plastics/Pexco LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE TES 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR RiverWoods Durham 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8440 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08440 - Store # 8440 Durham 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sig Sauer (Durham) 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 27.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Historical Properties Inc. 27.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sabater USA, Inc. - Production 27.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - GEMS School 440 27.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Umicore Attleboro MA 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG433 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integris Ambulatory Care Corp. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rbco 44 Oh 90-44-01-90 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.