Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Aegis of Moraga

Moraga, CA · ~71 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Moraga runs at 455% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Moraga: 17.3 TCR = 455% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Moraga safety composite

Aegis of Moraga scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 38.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Moraga: 3.3 → 38.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 92.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.23× in 2024

Aegis of Moraga's TCR rose 35.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 38.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 92.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Moraga, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 455% of ind

  • DART 38.5 DART
  • RANK #543/635
  • PHOTO Magnolia Gardens Mem…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magnolia Gardens Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Moraga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Moraga averages 17.3 TCR (455% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Moraga TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=17.9 · 2019=8 · 2020=19.1 · 2021=22.8 · 2022=92 · 2023=19.8 · 2024=38.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Moraga falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #543 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Aegis of Moraga (71 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Moraga
Aegis of Moraga (71 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Moraga has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 38.5 38.5 5 17 0
2023 19.8 17.9 7 4 0
2022 92.0 92.0 7 39 0
2021 22.8 20.9 6 6 0
2020 19.1 12.7 7 5 0
2019 8.0 3.2 5 0 0
2018 17.9 13.1 11 0 0
2017 8.9 6.0 6 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Moraga

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 16 employers in Moraga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Gardens Memory Care 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Palms of Fort Myers 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Villa Lakeland 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Cottage - Hanover 17.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE M Pineda Farming Co 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE AgSource Services, LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schafer Ranch, Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & J Dondero Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR BrightStar Care 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT ST MARYS COLLEGE CALIF 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT ST MARY'S COLLEGE(CALIF) 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY 0025 0969 119 FTE
NAT-TCR Fayette Central Elementary School 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 84 - Fairfield 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St. George Day Program 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Wall Systems Inc 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valero Renewable Fuels Company, LLC dba Valero Albert City Plant 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 007/Cedarville University 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain Recycling Inc 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.