Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer

Seattle, WA · ~69 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer: 11.3 TCR = 298% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer safety composite

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer: 4.0 → 20.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 21.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.82× in 2024

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer's TCR rose 16.7 from 4.0 in 2016 to 20.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 298% of ind

  • DART 20.7 DART
  • RANK #137/216
  • PHOTO Ecumen Seasons at Ap…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ecumen Seasons at Apple Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer averages 11.3 TCR (298% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=21.2 · 2022=18.9 · 2023=13.9 · 2024=20.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer (69 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer
Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer (69 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.7 20.7 3 7 0
2023 13.9 13.9 0 8 0
2022 18.9 18.9 2 7 0
2021 21.2 19.2 7 4 0
2020 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2018 10.4 10.4 7 0 0
2017 6.4 6.4 4 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Seattle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Seasons at Apple Valley 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Island House 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Springs East Louisville 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Valencia 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NBI 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE O'Brien Orchards, Inc. 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flanagan and Jones, LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE GenCap Construction Corp. 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR New York - Yankee Stadium 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0063 San Jose 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bills Superette #10 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aspen Produce LLC 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tosca - Green Bay 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE CP&P Dunn Precast 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barclay Brook Elementary School 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Industrial Co. - Pleasant Prairie, WI 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.