Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Kentucky

Magnolia Springs East Louisville

Louisville, KY · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magnolia Springs East Louisville runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Magnolia Springs East Louisville: 11.3 TCR = 298% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magnolia Springs East Louisville safety composite

Magnolia Springs East Louisville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Magnolia Springs East Louisville: 4.1 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 20.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2020

Magnolia Springs East Louisville's TCR rose 6.7 from 4.1 in 2017 to 10.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Louisville, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 298% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #50/64
  • PHOTO Aegis of Queen Anne …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Magnolia Springs East Louisville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magnolia Springs East Louisville averages 11.3 TCR (298% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magnolia Springs East Louisville TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=20.8 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=10.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Magnolia Springs East Louisville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Magnolia Springs East Louisville (70 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Magnolia Springs East Louisville
Magnolia Springs East Louisville (70 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Magnolia Springs East Louisville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 10.8 6.5 5 0 0
2019 9.6 2.4 4 0 0
2018 20.8 0.0 3 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · KY · Louisville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Seasons at Apple Valley 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Island House 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Valencia 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Pipeline Construction Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bristol Group 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & S Installation Services LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rizzo Brothers Painting Contractors, Inc 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality Life Services Sarver 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmers Union Oil Company of Berthold/Carpio 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1084-CMC Home Care - University 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kw Industries 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weaver Elementary 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blakely Plant 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christensen Shipyards 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valero Renewable Fuels Company LLC dba Valero Fort Dodge Plant 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.