Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Aegis of Redmond

Redmond, WA · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Redmond runs at 451% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Redmond: 17.1 TCR = 451% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Redmond safety composite

Aegis of Redmond scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 35.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Redmond: 0.0 → 37.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 71.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.06× in 2024

Aegis of Redmond's TCR rose 37.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 37.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 71.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redmond, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.1 · 451% of ind

  • DART 35.3 DART
  • RANK #188/216
  • PHOTO The Legacy of Farmin…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Legacy of Farmington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Redmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Redmond averages 17.1 TCR (451% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Redmond TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=21 · 2018=15.3 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=17.5 · 2022=71.7 · 2023=29.2 · 2024=37.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Redmond falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #188 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Aegis of Redmond (50 employees, TCR 17.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Redmond
Aegis of Redmond (50 employees, TCR 17.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Redmond has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 37.6 35.3 4 12 0
2023 29.2 26.8 1 11 0
2022 71.7 71.7 5 17 0
2021 17.5 17.5 3 3 0
2020 9.2 9.2 4 0 0
2019 7.3 7.3 3 0 0
2018 15.3 15.3 5 1 0
2017 21.0 18.7 9 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Redmond

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Legacy of Farmington 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Clinton - IL 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Newnan 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crossgate 17.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hyer Farms 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Northwest 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bronze Star Inc 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&L Farm Pasco - Burbank 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Morningstar Children and Family Services 17.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0204 Monterey 17.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Calhoun County Law Enforcement 17.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Continuing Healthcare of Milan 17.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tecta America Birmingham 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaverton Kia 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE JB Roofing a Tecta America Company LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traverse City 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.