Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Washington

Lilac City Logistics HGE1

Spokane, WA · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
33.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 runs at 513% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Lilac City Logistics HGE1: 33.3 TCR = 513% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 safety composite

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 33.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 40.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lilac City Logistics HGE1: 26.3 → 40.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 40.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2023

Lilac City Logistics HGE1's TCR rose 14.0 from 26.3 in 2022 to 40.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Spokane, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 33.3 · 513% of ind

  • DART 40.4 DART
  • RANK #168/168
  • PHOTO WTX3 - 1111 Fulwiler…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WTX3 - 1111 Fulwiler Drive Abilene TX 79603 (3.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lilac City Logistics HGE1 averages 33.3 TCR (513% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 TCR series: 2022=26.3 · 2023=40.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Lilac City Logistics HGE1 falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 168 Express delivery services (exc employers in Washington.

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 (50 employees, TCR 33.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Lilac City Logistics HGE1
Lilac City Logistics HGE1 (50 employees, TCR 33.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Lilac City Logistics HGE1 has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 40.4 40.4 15 0 0
2022 26.3 26.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · WA · Spokane

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WTX3 - 1111 Fulwiler Drive Abilene TX 79603 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WAWNA - WENATCHEE 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRAVITY HILL LOGISTICS, LLC 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nexus Logistics Services LLC 29.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Interbay 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snow and Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safe Routes LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Roofing 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Oakdale, MN 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Upham House 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Rehab Hosp Springfield 6784 - 4075 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Lansing Plant 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.