Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Aegis on Madison

Seattle, WA · ~123 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis on Madison runs at 453% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis on Madison: 17.2 TCR = 453% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis on Madison safety composite

Aegis on Madison scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis on Madison: 6.6 → 37.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 38.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.83× in 2024

Aegis on Madison's TCR rose 30.6 from 6.6 in 2016 to 37.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 38.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.2 · 453% of ind

  • DART 31.5 DART
  • RANK #189/216
  • PHOTO CrownPointe of India…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CrownPointe of Indianapolis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aegis on Madison in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis on Madison averages 17.2 TCR (453% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis on Madison TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=38 · 2023=38.3 · 2024=37.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis on Madison falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Aegis on Madison (123 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis on Madison
Aegis on Madison (123 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis on Madison has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 37.1 31.5 14 19 0
2023 38.3 35.3 10 28 0
2022 38.0 36.8 4 28 0
2021 7.3 7.3 4 2 0
2020 13.7 13.7 7 7 0
2019 6.5 3.7 7 0 0
2018 4.7 2.8 5 0 0
2017 2.6 1.7 3 0 0
2016 6.6 6.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Seattle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CrownPointe of Indianapolis 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton House of Augusta 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone at Hampton 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere at sherwood 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE STS Remodeling Corp 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haskell Corporation 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merit Electric of Spokane, INC. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 21 - SCAFCO/Spokane 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Little Falls Machine, Inc. 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caldwell Enterprise, Inc. 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Scranton Health Care Center 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Farm Slaughterhouse, LLC 17.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Boyne 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ketchum 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iroquois Paving Corporation 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toftrees Golf Resort and Conference Center 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.