Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Washington

Good Samaritan Health Care

Yakima, WA · ~123 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
36.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Samaritan Health Care runs at 553% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Good Samaritan Health Care: 36.0 TCR = 553% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Samaritan Health Care safety composite

Good Samaritan Health Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 35.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 35.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Good Samaritan Health Care: 27.2 → 59.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 74.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.56× in 2024

Good Samaritan Health Care's TCR rose 32.7 from 27.2 in 2021 to 59.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 74.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Yakima, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 36.0 · 553% of ind

  • DART 56.1 DART
  • RANK #190/190
  • PHOTO Andover Manor Rehab …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing (6.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Good Samaritan Health Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Samaritan Health Care averages 36.0 TCR (553% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Good Samaritan Health Care TCR series: 2021=27.2 · 2022=74.8 · 2023=44.8 · 2024=59.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Good Samaritan Health Care falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #190 safest of 190 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Washington.

Good Samaritan Health Care (123 employees, TCR 36.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Samaritan Health Care
Good Samaritan Health Care (123 employees, TCR 36.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Good Samaritan Health Care has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 59.9 56.1 13 50 0
2023 44.8 35.0 11 35 0
2022 74.8 69.6 12 60 0
2021 27.2 23.8 8 24 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WA · Yakima

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 192 employers in Yakima, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shook Home 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_338 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-752 29.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aegis on Madison 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01630 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tote- South 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seattle Humane 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yakima Valley Hospital WA 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Borton Fruit 1,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yakima County 997 FTE
CITY-NEAR Borton Orchards 918 FTE
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Talus Development 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE AbsolutAire, Inc. 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Mechanical, LLC 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Butcher Block, Inc. dba North Country Smokehouse 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.