Aerosol can filling on a job order or contract basis · Missouri

Aerofil Technology

Name: Aerofil Technology Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Sullivan, MO · ~413 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.8
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aerofil Technology runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aerosol can filling on a job order or contract basis workplace, earning a grade C.

Aerofil Technology: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Aerosol can filling on a job order or contract basis BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aerofil Technology safety composite

Aerofil Technology scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers
DART rate: F 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aerofil Technology: 2.6 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2023

Aerofil Technology's TCR rose 1.1 from 2.6 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Sullivan, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

DART 2.1 DART
RANK #7/11
PHOTO Multisorb Technologies
BOOK 5y book
INJ 66 inj
SIZE ~413 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Multisorb Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.8
Multisorb Tech

2.8
Daubert Cromwe

2.8
Highline Warre

2.8
Chem Technolog

2.8

What this shows Aerofil Technology averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Aerosol can filling on a job order or contract basis BLS benchmark).

Aerofil Technology TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=3 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Aerofil Technology falls in its industry

485 Aerosol can filling on a job o establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Aerosol can filling on a job o employers in Missouri.

Aerofil Technology (413 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Aerofil Technology has more employees than the Aerosol can filling on a job order or co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2023	3.7	2.1	14	2
2022	1.2	0.7	5	0
2021	3.4	2.7	14	0
2017	3.0	1.7	18	0
2016	2.6	1.2	15	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · MO · Sullivan

485 Aerosol can filling on a job order or contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 26 employers in Sullivan, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Multisorb Technologies	BUFFALO, NY	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Daubert Cromwell, LLC	ALSIP, IL	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Highline Warren Greensboro	GREENSBORO, NC	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Chem Technologies, Ltd.	MIDDLEFIELD, OH	2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.	ST. LOUIS	413 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Progress West Hospital	O'FALLON	413 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Faurecia Interior Systems-Blue Springs	BLUE SPRINGS	414 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MBS Textbook Exchange, LLC	COLUMBIA	412 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Missouri Baptist Sullivan Hospital	Sullivan	328 FTE
CITY-NEAR	65	Sullivan	310 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 65	Sullivan	309 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Meramec Group, Inc.	Sullivan	235 FTE
NAT-TCR	Kinpak Inc.	Montgomery, AL	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Gibbs Die Casting	Henderson, KY	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Electrolurgy Inc.	Irvine, CA	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	bmw of ramsey	Ramsey, NJ	2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Market Basket #89	Warwick, RI	413 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ryvor Group	Fort Myers, FL	413 FTE
NAT-SIZE	USM Store #502 (Market Street)	Lubbock, TX	413 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0175 - Monroe Township Nj (Dry) Depot	Monroe Township, NJ	413 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.