Transportation equipment and supplies (except marine pleasure craft, motor vehicles) merchant wholesalers · Washington

Aeroforge, Inc.

Puyallup, WA · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aeroforge, Inc. runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Transportation equipment and supplies (except marine pleasure craft, motor vehicles) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Aeroforge, Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 166% of Transportation equipment and supplies (except marine pleasure craft, motor vehicles) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aeroforge, Inc. safety composite

Aeroforge, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2019→2023

Aeroforge, Inc. injury rate improved

Aeroforge, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.1 · 2020=5.5 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423860 · Puyallup, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Boeing Distribution …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boeing Distribution Services Inc. - Miami, FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aeroforge, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aeroforge, Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (166% of the Transportation equipment and supplies (except marine pleasure craft, motor vehicles) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aeroforge, Inc. TCR series: 2019=3.1 · 2020=5.5 · 2022=6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Aeroforge, Inc. falls in its industry

107 Transportation equipment and s establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Transportation equipment and s employers in Washington.

Aeroforge, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Aeroforge, Inc.
Aeroforge, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Aeroforge, Inc. has fewer employees than the Transportation equipment and supplies (e median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2020 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423860 · WA · Puyallup

107 Transportation equipment and supplies (except marine pleasure craft, motor vehicles) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 172 employers in Puyallup, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boeing Distribution Services Inc. - Miami, FL 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlstar-Clinton 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midnite Express Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Field Operations 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE BNW Quincy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Aquaculture Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/V Arica 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR MultiCare Good Samaritan Hospital (Company 15) 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 2,622 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA014 1,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEFNCO Communications 999 FTE
NAT-TCR Courtyard Fort Worth Alliance Town Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW Trans Tech 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Laney Electrical Construction, Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AID Upstate 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CGW Abrasives 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Senior Living 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab Tire Center-Medford Commerce Drive 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Tankermen, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.