Electrical contractors · North Carolina

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc

Wilmington, NC · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc: 3.6 TCR = 130% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc safety composite

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2023

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc injury rate improved

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc's TCR fell 4.1 from 9.2 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.2 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Wilmington, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/108
  • PHOTO JPM INC dba Tri Phas…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JPM INC dba Tri Phase Electric (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laney Electrical Construction, Inc averages 3.6 TCR (130% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=5.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Laney Electrical Construction, Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 108 Electrical contractors employers in North Carolina.

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc (21 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Laney Electrical Construction, Inc
Laney Electrical Construction, Inc (21 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Laney Electrical Construction, Inc has fewer employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NC · Wilmington

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JPM INC dba Tri Phase Electric 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEI Companies, Inc. HQ 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freedom Solar, LLC - Dallas 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Libra Electric Co 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timothy Yarbrough 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty NC Breeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCJA1-SEL-JASON 1' 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunburst Trout Farms 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
NAT-TCR Hanover Nursing Management LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW Trans Tech 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aeroforge, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Fort Worth Alliance Town Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coram - Middle Country Road 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson IRA - Amityville 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE McDal Corporation KOP 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.