Electric power generation, solar · California

AES Clean Energy

Lancaster, CA · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Clean Energy runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, solar workplace, earning a grade C.

AES Clean Energy: 1.0 TCR = 85% of Electric power generation, solar BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Clean Energy safety composite

AES Clean Energy scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AES Clean Energy: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

AES Clean Energy's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221114 · Lancaster, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.0 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/32
  • PHOTO Enphase Energy Petal…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Enphase Energy Petaluma CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

AES Clean Energy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Clean Energy averages 1.0 TCR (85% of the Electric power generation, solar BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Clean Energy TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2 · BLS 1.2

Where AES Clean Energy falls in its industry

157 Electric power generation, sol establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 32 Electric power generation, sol employers in California.

AES Clean Energy (51 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Clean Energy
AES Clean Energy (51 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 1.2

AES Clean Energy has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, solar median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221114 · CA · Lancaster

157 Electric power generation, solar employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Enphase Energy Petaluma CA 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesis Solar Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centrica Business Solutions - Vista Solar 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nevada Solar One 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR 435 Aer - Culpeper 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Tukwila 15820 International Blvd 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 355 - Production Pump 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Kettering University 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4028-ARW15 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE NML 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kare Home Assistance, LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Musselman - New Holland 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.