Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) · Pennsylvania

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions)

Montgomeryville, PA · ~275 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade C.

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions): 3.0 TCR = 103% of Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) safety composite

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions): 2.3 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2021

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions)'s TCR rose 1.8 from 2.3 in 2019 to 4.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Montgomeryville, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 103% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #13/33
  • PHOTO CR Meyer - Byron
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~275 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CR Meyer - Byron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) averages 3.0 TCR (103% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=4 · BLS 2.9

Where AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) falls in its industry

924 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 33 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Pennsylvania.

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) (275 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Clean Technology (All Divisions)
AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) (275 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, ind median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 3.4 12 0 0
2020 2.6 1.1 7 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · PA · Montgomeryville

924 Addition, alteration and renovation, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 47 employers in Montgomeryville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CR Meyer - Byron 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metalsa 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Building Group 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fricke Management & Contracting Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Devault Foods 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shank's Extracts, LLC d.b.a. Universal Ingredients - Shank's 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hayward Laboratories Inc. 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Libertas Copper LLC dba Hussey Copper 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philadelphia 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR AES Clean Technology 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR Omni Health Services 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harriet Carter Gifts, Inc 198 FTE
NAT-TCR Ennis-Flint CLC Campus 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR JAN-TX-DFW 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hca-Henrico Doctors - Parham 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Binghamton Univ-Collegiate Ctr 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHC 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weidmann Electrical Technology, Inc. 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Sonesta New Orleans 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE MVRBC - Davenport 275 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.