Distribution of electric power · Indiana

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center

Indianapolis, IN · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center: 1.1 TCR = 95% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center safety composite

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center held a steady TCR band

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.7 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/87
  • PHOTO Steuben County REMC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steuben County REMC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center averages 1.1 TCR (95% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center TCR series: 2022=1.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 1.2

Where AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 87 Distribution of electric power employers in Indiana.

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center (66 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center
AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center (66 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IN · Indianapolis

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steuben County REMC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Ardmore Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson Operations Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. Corporate Office 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terre Haute Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE 573-NiSource-Angola IN-Operating HQ 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntington 04 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE WB Koester Construction, LLC 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Mpni LLC-Las Vegas 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips RIMP 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Last Key Property Services, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Porsche Tampa 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE EMPIE, Inc 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Qualitau Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Emc-Emcaz-Earnhardt Management 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artistic Southern - Charlotte 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.