Electric Power Distribution · South Carolina

Anderson Operations Center

Anderson, SC · ~58 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson Operations Center runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

Anderson Operations Center: 1.1 TCR = 95% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson Operations Center safety composite

Anderson Operations Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anderson Operations Center: 1.4 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.41× in 2024

Anderson Operations Center's TCR rose 1.8 from 1.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Anderson, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #36/86
  • PHOTO Steuben County REMC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steuben County REMC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Anderson Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson Operations Center averages 1.1 TCR (95% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson Operations Center TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Anderson Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 86 Electric Power Distribution employers in South Carolina.

Anderson Operations Center (58 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson Operations Center
Anderson Operations Center (58 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Anderson Operations Center has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SC · Anderson

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 167 employers in Anderson, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steuben County REMC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Ardmore Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. Corporate Office 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE URQUHART STEAM PLANT 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTHERN INSTALLATIONS, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fuji Film 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA SC West Columbia 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR AnMed Medical Center 2,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anmed Health Medical Center 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch AdP 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdP 1,314 FTE
NAT-TCR ACI Corp 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aliso Viejo 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Halifax County Schools Va 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Gordon 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilmington North Operations Complex 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Travis Custodial 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mill Creek Alz 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHNJ Hospitality LLC 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.