Distribution of natural gas · Georgia

AGLC Savannah Service Center

Savannah, GA · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AGLC Savannah Service Center runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade F.

AGLC Savannah Service Center: 3.8 TCR = 313% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AGLC Savannah Service Center safety composite

AGLC Savannah Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2019→2024

AGLC Savannah Service Center injury rate improved

AGLC Savannah Service Center's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.2 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Savannah, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.8 · 313% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/61
  • PHOTO Charlotte Meter To P…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charlotte Meter To Payment PNG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

AGLC Savannah Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AGLC Savannah Service Center averages 3.8 TCR (313% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AGLC Savannah Service Center TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where AGLC Savannah Service Center falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 61 Distribution of natural gas employers in Georgia.

AGLC Savannah Service Center (50 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AGLC Savannah Service Center
AGLC Savannah Service Center (50 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

AGLC Savannah Service Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 0 1 0
2022 5.8 0.0 0 3 0
2021 3.9 0.0 1 1 0
2020 8.9 2.2 1 3 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · GA · Savannah

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charlotte Meter To Payment PNG 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5808 ASHLEYANNE CT WICHITA FALLS TX 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GREENLAWN-NY51 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bellwood 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sowega Cotton Gin & Warehouse, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Customer Service - 1112 Veteran's Parkway Columbus, GA 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATL1-DWH-ATLANTA DIVISION 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE HJR PROGRAM MGMT 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Travelodge - Belen 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamond Plastics Corporation Grand Island 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bill Harris Used Cars Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-County School #2358 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Financial Equipment Company 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE O.Keller Tool Engineering 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Cherokee Construction, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gonzales 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.