Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Georgia

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.

Alpharetta, GA · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. runs at 593% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.: 16.6 TCR = 593% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. safety composite

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2023→2024

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. injury rate improved

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.'s TCR fell 4.8 from 19.0 in 2023 to 14.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=19.0 · 2024=14.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Alpharetta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 593% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #123/123
  • PHOTO Adam Mechanical
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Adam Mechanical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. averages 16.6 TCR (593% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. TCR series: 2023=19 · 2024=14.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 123 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Georgia.

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. (50 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc.
Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. (50 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Neese Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.2 11.8 6 0 0
2023 19.0 16.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · GA · Alpharetta

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Adam Mechanical 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Plumbing & Heating Systems, Inc 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Heating and Air 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gering Valley Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sowega Cotton Gin & Warehouse, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Customer Service - 1112 Veteran's Parkway Columbus, GA 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Savannah Service Center 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATL1-DWH-ATLANTA DIVISION 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Waltham Operation LLC 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Asmby 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Logging Inc 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Valor Plastics 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE FrenchCreek Production 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Building LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoneway Electric Supply Br 209 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogers NW Flint Group 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.