Automobile & Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers · Oregon

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse

Portland, OR · ~135 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse runs at 383% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automobile & Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse: 8.4 TCR = 383% of Automobile & Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse safety composite

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse: 7.0 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2017

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse's TCR rose 2.8 from 7.0 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423110 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 383% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #20/23
  • PHOTO 4598-RTC JACKSONVILLE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4598-RTC JACKSONVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse averages 8.4 TCR (383% of the Automobile & Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=9.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse falls in its industry

1,333 Automobile & Other Motor Vehic establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 23 Automobile & Other Motor Vehic employers in Oregon.

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse (135 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse
Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse (135 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Ahm Zone Office/Training Cntr/Warehouse has more employees than the Automobile & Other Motor Vehicle Merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 9.9 9.9 6 0 0
2016 7.0 1.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423110 · OR · Portland

1,333 Automobile & Other Motor Vehicle Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4598-RTC JACKSONVILLE 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mankato Harrison Truck Centers 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 74 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Bridges Truck City Inc 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kraemer Farms LLC 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland Water Bureau Operations 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arctic Sheet Metal, Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoseon Technology, Inc. 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR United Mail Sorting, Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Omaha Hub (Neoma) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Niantic (Ctnia) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR San Luis Obispo (Caslo) 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodbridge Sales & Engineering 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beachcomber Beach Resort 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE 01-Memphis TN 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peapod Camp Hill, Pa 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.