Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Oregon

Phoseon Technology, Inc.

Name: Phoseon Technology, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Hillsboro, OR · ~135 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 1.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoseon Technology, Inc. runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Phoseon Technology, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoseon Technology, Inc. safety composite

Phoseon Technology, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2024

Phoseon Technology, Inc. injury rate improved

Phoseon Technology, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Hillsboro, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK P40
PHOTO Renishaw Inc-Auburn …
BOOK 6y book
INJ 13 inj
SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.7
Renishaw Inc-A

1.7
IDEX Corp

1.7
Emerson Automa

1.7
TMCO Operating

1.7

What this shows Phoseon Technology, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Phoseon Technology, Inc. TCR series: 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Phoseon Technology, Inc. falls in its industry

322 Electric and electronic contro establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Phoseon Technology, Inc. (135 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Phoseon Technology, Inc. has more employees than the Electric and electronic controllers, ind median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2024	0.0	0.0	0
2023	0.8	0.0	1
2022	1.1	0.0	2
2021	2.6	0.9	3
2019	3.2	0.8	4
2018	2.2	2.2	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · OR · Hillsboro

322 Electric and electronic controllers, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 282 employers in Hillsboro, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI	AUBURN HILLS, MI	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	IDEX Corp	MIDDLEBORO, MA	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Emerson Automation Solutions - Eden Prairie	EDEN PRAIRIE, MN	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	TMCO Operating	WEWOKA, OK	1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Kraemer Farms LLC	MT. ANGEL	135 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Portland Water Bureau Operations	PORTLAND	135 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Arctic Sheet Metal, Inc	PORTLAND	135 FTE
STATE-SIZE	AHM ZONE OFFICE/TRAINING CNTR/WAREHOUSE	PORTLAND	135 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Ronler Acres Campus	Hillsboro	11,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Jones Farm Campus	Hillsboro	7,114 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Aloha Campus	Hillsboro	1,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hawthorn Farm Campus	Hillsboro	1,638 FTE
NAT-TCR	Norwich Springs Health Campus	Hillard, OH	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	444 Lakeville Rd	New Hyde Park, NY	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Pryor Lumber Company Inc	Pryor, OK	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Kay Manufacturing Co.	Saint Joseph, MI	1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Grane Transportation Lines Ltd.	Chicago, IL	135 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Avantara Evergreen Park	Evergreen Park, IL	135 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Phoenix Tube	Bethlehem, PA	135 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Dot Transportation, Inc. Cambridge City, IN	Cambridge City, IN	135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.