Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · California

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs runs at 601% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs: 13.2 TCR = 601% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs safety composite

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs: 11.3 → 15.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs's TCR rose 3.8 from 11.3 in 2023 to 15.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 601% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #87/91
  • PHOTO Harding Metals, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harding Metals, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs averages 13.2 TCR (601% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs TCR series: 2023=11.3 · 2024=15.2 · BLS 2.2

Where AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 91 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in California.

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs (29 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs
AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs (29 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

AIM Recycling Santa Fe Springs has fewer employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.2 11.4 4 0 0
2023 11.3 11.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harding Metals, Inc. 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beacon Muskegon 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Alloys 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PICK N PULL 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Vallia Foods LLC 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Husky Products, LLC 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Marshall Public School 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR William Penn Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Harrisonburg 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lone Star San Antonio Medina Street 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgeport CT 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucker Columbia 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.