Sprayers and dusters, farm-type, manufacturing · California

Air-O-Fan Products Corp

Reedley, CA · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Air-O-Fan Products Corp runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sprayers and dusters, farm-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Air-O-Fan Products Corp: 6.2 TCR = 188% of Sprayers and dusters, farm-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Air-O-Fan Products Corp safety composite

Air-O-Fan Products Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2017→2024

Air-O-Fan Products Corp injury rate improved

Air-O-Fan Products Corp's TCR fell 5.5 from 13.9 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.9 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Reedley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 188% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #19/45
  • PHOTO Vermeer Corporation …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vermeer Corporation - Freeman (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Air-O-Fan Products Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Air-O-Fan Products Corp averages 6.2 TCR (188% of the Sprayers and dusters, farm-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Air-O-Fan Products Corp TCR series: 2017=13.9 · 2018=6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Air-O-Fan Products Corp falls in its industry

433 Sprayers and dusters, farm-typ establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 45 Sprayers and dusters, farm-typ employers in California.

Air-O-Fan Products Corp (39 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Air-O-Fan Products Corp
Air-O-Fan Products Corp (39 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Air-O-Fan Products Corp has fewer employees than the Sprayers and dusters, farm-type, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 4.2 2 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 11.2 11.2 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 6.0 4.0 3 0 0
2017 13.9 4.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · CA · Reedley

433 Sprayers and dusters, farm-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reedley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vermeer Corporation - Freeman 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimbell Gin Machinery 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insta-Pro International 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Central Irrigation 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Felipe Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Brothers Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE TLC Custom Farming Company LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonoma Valley Vineyards 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Medical Center-Reedley 961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Packing 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moonlight Packing Company LLC Field 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAR BENNETT LLC 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Kearsley Operator LP 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock River Fabrications 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Tuscola 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #28 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE DDRC Weiland Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Private Fleet in 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benton Harbor 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE IEA - Brooklyn Park 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.