Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) · Arkansas

Air Ready - MRO Services

Melbourne, AR · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Air Ready - MRO Services runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) workplace, earning a grade A.

Air Ready - MRO Services: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Air Ready - MRO Services safety composite

Air Ready - MRO Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2022

Air Ready - MRO Services injury rate improved

Air Ready - MRO Services's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Melbourne, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Enstrom Helicopter C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Enstrom Helicopter Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Air Ready - MRO Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Air Ready - MRO Services averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Air Ready - MRO Services TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Air Ready - MRO Services falls in its industry

390 Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., res establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., res employers in Arkansas.

Air Ready - MRO Services (52 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Air Ready - MRO Services
Air Ready - MRO Services (52 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Air Ready - MRO Services has fewer employees than the Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.7 1.8 2 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · AR · Melbourne

390 Aircraft rebuilding (i.e., restoration to original design specifications) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 4 employers in Melbourne, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Enstrom Helicopter Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Los Angeles, CA (1484) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAG Aerospace-USFL03: Titusville, FL 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Gray Butte 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parks Brothers Farms, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods Hatchery 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Star Contractors, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE AR 1a 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR MLBNC, Inc. dba Pioneer Therapy and Living 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR AirReady MRO Services, Inc. 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beasley Flooring Products 55 FTE
NAT-TCR 4795-PS-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PSAA 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Foley Hammonton NJ 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Deluxe Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schmitt Drywall Contracting 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nob Hill 629-San Ramon 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Hawaii Concrete 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Hill Skilled Rehab Nursing Unit 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tree Top, Inc-Woodburn Plant 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.