Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

Atrium at Serenity Pointe

Hot Springs, AR · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atrium at Serenity Pointe runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Atrium at Serenity Pointe: 11.6 TCR = 305% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atrium at Serenity Pointe safety composite

Atrium at Serenity Pointe scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2020→2024

Atrium at Serenity Pointe injury rate improved

Atrium at Serenity Pointe's TCR fell 7.5 from 12.9 in 2020 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 33.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=12.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=33.8 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hot Springs, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 305% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #46/51
  • PHOTO Maple Valley Dementi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maple Valley Dementia Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Atrium at Serenity Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atrium at Serenity Pointe averages 11.6 TCR (305% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atrium at Serenity Pointe TCR series: 2020=12.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=33.8 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Atrium at Serenity Pointe falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

Atrium at Serenity Pointe (52 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Atrium at Serenity Pointe
Atrium at Serenity Pointe (52 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Atrium at Serenity Pointe has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 1.4 4 0 0
2023 33.8 5.6 5 1 0
2022 3.8 0.8 4 1 0
2021 2.1 0.7 2 1 0
2020 12.9 10.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Hot Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 112 employers in Hot Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maple Valley Dementia Care 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Cary Parkway AL 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Poland Way 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isle at Raider Ranch 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parks Brothers Farms, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods Hatchery 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Star Contractors, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE AR 1a 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03080001-030802 1,198 FTE
CITY-NEAR NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 690 FTE
NAT-TCR Flpin - Pinellas Park 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucker Columbia 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ziggy's, Lewiston, ID 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Ready Controls - OK 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0679 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0424 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0381 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0263 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.