Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Ohio

AirBorn Electronics

Akron, OH · ~106 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AirBorn Electronics runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

AirBorn Electronics: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AirBorn Electronics safety composite

AirBorn Electronics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2021

AirBorn Electronics injury rate improved

AirBorn Electronics's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Akron, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO PEI-Genesis
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PEI-Genesis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

AirBorn Electronics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AirBorn Electronics averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AirBorn Electronics TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where AirBorn Electronics falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Ohio.

AirBorn Electronics (106 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate AirBorn Electronics
AirBorn Electronics (106 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

AirBorn Electronics has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.1 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · OH · Akron

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 512 employers in Akron, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PEI-Genesis 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRM A Corning Company 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics / Endevco 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Roofing & Insulating Company 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - DuPont 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metcon Ltd 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Witmer's Feed & Grain Inc 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron 6,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akron Children's Hospital 6,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summa Health - Akron City 4,801 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akron General Medical Center 4,176 FTE
NAT-TCR Decatur West Oil Extraction 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wurth Snider Bolt & Screw, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Children'S Hospital-Wisconsin 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Instrumentation : Washington SPO711 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor - Dwight #119 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maya Management Group LLC 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Merrimack College-Cafeteria 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.