Building Cleaning/Maintenance · California

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp

Chula Vista, CA · ~106 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade D.

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp: 5.8 TCR = 128% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp safety composite

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2021

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp injury rate improved

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp's TCR fell 2.2 from 5.7 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=5.6 · 2021=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Chula Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #204/368
  • PHOTO Nemours Children's H…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nemours Children's Hospital-Or (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp averages 5.8 TCR (128% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=5.6 · 2021=3.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 368 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in California.

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp (106 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp
Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp (106 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med - Hskp has more employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.5 0.8 8 1 0
2019 5.6 0.0 4 0 0
2018 8.4 4.2 6 0 0
2017 5.7 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Chula Vista

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nemours Children's Hospital-Or 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT P&G ALBANY JANITORIAL 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAN-FL-MCO 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kleen-Tech Services, LLC / Boulder 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE D & J Farm Management LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Calf Ranch 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monte Vista Farming Company LLC. 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Farm Labor Contracting, Inc 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR 4818-SOCH 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard By Marriott 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PrairieLand Partners - Iola 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 455 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Merrimack College-Cafeteria 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Central Conn St Univ-Retail 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maya Management Group LLC 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hazlett Tree Service, Inc 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.