Hoods, industrial, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing · North Carolina

AirClean Systems

Creedmoor, NC · ~101 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AirClean Systems runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hoods, industrial, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

AirClean Systems: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Hoods, industrial, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AirClean Systems safety composite

AirClean Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AirClean Systems: 3.5 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

AirClean Systems's TCR rose 1.2 from 3.5 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Creedmoor, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Helgesen Industries …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Helgesen Industries - 60 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

AirClean Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AirClean Systems averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Hoods, industrial, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AirClean Systems TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=4.5 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where AirClean Systems falls in its industry

449 Hoods, industrial, fabricated establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Hoods, industrial, fabricated employers in North Carolina.

AirClean Systems (101 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AirClean Systems
AirClean Systems (101 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

AirClean Systems has more employees than the Hoods, industrial, fabricated metal plat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 3.5 4 0 0
2022 4.5 3.6 5 0 0
2021 1.9 1.0 2 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 6 0 0
2019 4.1 4.1 4 0 0
2018 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2017 4.5 4.5 4 0 0
2016 3.5 3.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · NC · Creedmoor

449 Hoods, industrial, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 20 employers in Creedmoor, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Helgesen Industries - 60 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nash 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sauder Custom Fabrication, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MonoSystems Inc 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greensboro Resource Center - PNG 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barringer Construction, LLC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrier Commercial Services (Charlotte Northwoods) 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creedmoor 870 FTE
CITY-NEAR Firstmark Aerospace Corporation 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3032_5860 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creedmoor Plant 105 FTE
NAT-TCR National TX - 0805 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Spectra Wood 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-901 W. LANDSTREET RD 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DeWitt Store 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE C017 Fredericksburg 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transystems LLC - Renville Project 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Insulation - Main Office 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE La-Canasta Mexican Food Products, Inc. 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.