Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · North Carolina

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation

Creedmoor, NC · ~194 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation safety composite

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation: 0.0 → 0.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.33× in 2024

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Creedmoor, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Ducommun - Berryville
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ducommun - Berryville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Firstmark Aerospace Corporation averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Firstmark Aerospace Corporation falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in North Carolina.

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation (194 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Firstmark Aerospace Corporation
Firstmark Aerospace Corporation (194 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Firstmark Aerospace Corporation has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 0 1 0
2023 2.6 1.0 5 0 0
2022 2.0 0.7 2 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · NC · Creedmoor

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 20 employers in Creedmoor, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ducommun - Berryville 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich - Aircraft Wheels and Brakes - Spokane WA 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brazonics Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Rotorcraft - PA 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Asphalt 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Complex 46 Plants 1 and 2 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheboro 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCX Holding, LLC, wholly owned subsid of Hubbell Industrial Controls, Knightdale, NC 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creedmoor 870 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3032_5860 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creedmoor Plant 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR AirClean Systems 101 FTE
NAT-TCR Roy Rogers Burhan's 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AMECO Houston Operations 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ParkUSA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wag Services, Inc. Id 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cargill CSST 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prime Now LLC - UOH4 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DLI6 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DHT1 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.