Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Puerto Rico

Airport Aviation Services, Inc.

Carolina, PR · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade F.

Airport Aviation Services, Inc.: 11.9 TCR = 265% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. safety composite

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2019→2022

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Airport Aviation Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 7.4 from 7.5 in 2019 to 0.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.5 · 2020=20.0 · 2021=20.1 · 2022=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Carolina, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 265% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P4
  • PHOTO Avmax Montana, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avmax Montana, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Airport Aviation Services, Inc. averages 11.9 TCR (265% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. TCR series: 2019=7.5 · 2020=20 · 2021=20.1 · 2022=0.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Airport Aviation Services, Inc. falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Airport Aviation Services, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Airport Aviation Services, Inc.
Airport Aviation Services, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Airport Aviation Services, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.1 0.0 8 0 0
2021 20.1 1.8 9 2 0
2020 20.0 4.4 8 1 0
2019 7.5 7.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · PR · Carolina

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 106 employers in Carolina, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avmax Montana, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSY-ITP 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCO JB 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - AFM West JB Lewis-McChord 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE INDUPRO, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE CENTRO DE SALUD INTEGRAL EN COROZAL 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE CIC Construction Group LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermo Electron Puerto Rico 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis Security - Regiones 4,698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Del Carbe Inc - Carolina 1,082 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Del Carbe Inc Carolina 1,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Carolina 966 FTE
NAT-TCR LivGenerations Pinnacle Peak 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sign Effectz, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 230413-Bal-Hampden Sta 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 516996-Pearisburg Po 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-BOS-BOSTON-BOS-PDMT 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carrollton Health And Rehabilitation Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-TUS-TUCSON-TUS-PDMT 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-TYS-KNOXVILLE-TYS-PDMT 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.