Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Montana

Avmax Montana, Inc.

Great Falls, MT · ~98 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avmax Montana, Inc. runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade F.

Avmax Montana, Inc.: 11.9 TCR = 265% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avmax Montana, Inc. safety composite

Avmax Montana, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Avmax Montana, Inc.: 11.0 → 13.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.12× in 2022

Avmax Montana, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.2 from 11.0 in 2020 to 13.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Great Falls, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 265% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO AIRPORT AVIATION SER…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AIRPORT AVIATION SERVICES, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Avmax Montana, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avmax Montana, Inc. averages 11.9 TCR (265% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avmax Montana, Inc. TCR series: 2020=11 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=13.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Avmax Montana, Inc. falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Montana.

Avmax Montana, Inc. (98 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Avmax Montana, Inc.
Avmax Montana, Inc. (98 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Avmax Montana, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.2 1.5 9 0 0
2021 11.6 1.3 9 0 0
2020 11.0 9.4 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MT · Great Falls

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 121 employers in Great Falls, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AIRPORT AVIATION SERVICES, INC. 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSY-ITP 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCO JB 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - AFM West JB Lewis-McChord 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Solutions, LLC - ExxonMobil Refinery - Billings 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Proof Research Inc 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2253-N0416 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williams Plumbing and Heating- Big Sky 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2455 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7199 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2455 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7199 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Hygrade Precision Technologies 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeview Christian Home Health Hospice 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bath Manor Limited Partnership 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 166366-Pontiac Po 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alabama 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHX-SAUSA 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Workpointe Inc 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.