Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) · Utah

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N

Salt Lake City, UT · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) workplace, earning a grade C.

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N: 4.5 TCR = 99% of Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N safety composite

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2019→2023

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N injury rate improved

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N's TCR fell 8.9 from 8.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.9 · 2021=4.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO Skylease I Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Skylease I Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N averages 4.5 TCR (99% of the Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N TCR series: 2019=8.9 · 2021=4.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N falls in its industry

1,555 Airport operators (e.g., civil establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Airport operators (e.g., civil employers in Utah.

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N (56 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N
Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N (56 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Airport Warehse 3851 W. 1200 N has fewer employees than the Airport operators (e.g., civil, internat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2019 8.9 5.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · UT · Salt Lake City

1,555 Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Skylease I Inc 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prospect International Airport Services PDX 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EWR-D 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001090 LIT - 090 BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON NATIO 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountainland Apples, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brigham 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Building Supply - American Fork #863 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2453-00060368-60368 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Shriners Hospitals for Children - Portland 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Upper Midwest : SVC-Milwaukee WI-USA 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #0161 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hettich America, L.P. 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smalley Corporate & Ops 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ikonix USA 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wallingford (Dexmet) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elrac, LLC 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.