Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Michigan

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy

Troy, MI · ~139 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade D.

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy: 0.7 TCR = 140% of Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy safety composite

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Troy, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO 300 Third Street Cam…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 300 Third Street Cambridge MA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy averages 0.7 TCR (140% of the Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy falls in its industry

319 Industrial research and develo establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Industrial research and develo employers in Michigan.

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy (139 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy
Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy (139 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Akzo Nobel Vehicle Refinishes Troy has fewer employees than the Industrial research and development labo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · MI · Troy

319 Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 237 employers in Troy, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 300 Third Street Cambridge MA 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Research Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Business and Innovation Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sika Madison Heights 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raker-Roberta's Young Plants 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE JH Campbell 3 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSM Group 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Site Development, Inc. 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-309 5,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Troy - Maple Road 1,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
NAT-TCR Bravo! Facility Services, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CNH_Racine_Main 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SMP Welding 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-NJ-Cranbury-Corporate Drive 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ahlstrom Filtration LLC - Madisonville 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPP Cambridge 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suffolk Village (Vasfk) 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wadsworth (Ohwad) 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.