Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Indiana

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash

Wabash, IN · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash: 6.6 TCR = 199% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash safety composite

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.2

2018→2024

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash injury rate improved

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash's TCR fell 12.2 from 12.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.2 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=8.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Wabash, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 199% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/15
  • PHOTO Precision Heat Treat…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Heat Treating Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash averages 6.6 TCR (199% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash TCR series: 2018=12.2 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 15 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Indiana.

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash (28 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash
Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash (28 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Al-Fe Heat Treating Wabash has fewer employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 8.5 4.3 2 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2018 12.2 12.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · IN · Wabash

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 49 employers in Wabash, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Heat Treating Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing- Sturtevant 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Steel Treating, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Heat Treat, LLC 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Valley CCGT 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville District Office 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur County REMC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Columbus 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. 685 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Wabash) 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1667 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR White's Residential and Family Services 274 FTE
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Phoenix Downtown 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Poet Biorefining - Iowa Falls LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Seagate Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 450 Maguire Rd 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silver Angels - Putnam 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 60 FastFrame Walls 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate - Long Beach 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havasu Regional Medical Center - FNS 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.